<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Sneak Peak At The New Photoshop CS5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.designchair.co.uk/articles/a-sneak-peak-at-photoshop-cs5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.designchair.co.uk/articles/a-sneak-peak-at-photoshop-cs5/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 10:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Loudon</title>
		<link>http://blog.designchair.co.uk/articles/a-sneak-peak-at-photoshop-cs5/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>John Loudon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.designchair.co.uk/?p=60#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Just to add a feature to photoshop CS5

you know how in word if it crashes you don&#039;t lose the work, add this to the Adobe suite and save me wanting to kill myself when I lose digital paintings and designs that took me ages to map out.

I get this could be solved by saving, but come on how many apps have been built now and this is still not in the list, I can&#039;t be the only user that suffers this ?

or maybe I am :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to add a feature to photoshop CS5</p>
<p>you know how in word if it crashes you don&#8217;t lose the work, add this to the Adobe suite and save me wanting to kill myself when I lose digital paintings and designs that took me ages to map out.</p>
<p>I get this could be solved by saving, but come on how many apps have been built now and this is still not in the list, I can&#8217;t be the only user that suffers this ?</p>
<p>or maybe I am :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Loudon</title>
		<link>http://blog.designchair.co.uk/articles/a-sneak-peak-at-photoshop-cs5/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>John Loudon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.designchair.co.uk/?p=60#comment-17</guid>
		<description>You release if it was a case of just clicking a button and dreamweaver tells you exactly whats wrong and how to fix it many of us would be out of work ?

Dreamweaver inspires designers to be lazy as it is, coding a site is the only way to have it streamlined and light-weight in my honest opinion. I hate reading through peoples sites that use tools like DW, I get that it makes it easier for some people but dear god the extra code it adds is a nightmare.

I think for dreamweaver, JQuery and MooTools library support would be great for Ajax features to help us intergrate them much in the way they have put the spry framework.

Also to piggy back your idea of the browsers rending within dreamweaver, having a tool like firebug for them all would be win, like firebug light but suped up.

Also they should remove the CSS shit they added, this makes a pure mess of the styles. Code them by hand people only way to keep it clean and lean. Not everyone but many people are using that css tool and getting inline, internal styles as well as external, reading it is like O__o yea? and you want me to edit what exactly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You release if it was a case of just clicking a button and dreamweaver tells you exactly whats wrong and how to fix it many of us would be out of work ?</p>
<p>Dreamweaver inspires designers to be lazy as it is, coding a site is the only way to have it streamlined and light-weight in my honest opinion. I hate reading through peoples sites that use tools like DW, I get that it makes it easier for some people but dear god the extra code it adds is a nightmare.</p>
<p>I think for dreamweaver, JQuery and MooTools library support would be great for Ajax features to help us intergrate them much in the way they have put the spry framework.</p>
<p>Also to piggy back your idea of the browsers rending within dreamweaver, having a tool like firebug for them all would be win, like firebug light but suped up.</p>
<p>Also they should remove the CSS shit they added, this makes a pure mess of the styles. Code them by hand people only way to keep it clean and lean. Not everyone but many people are using that css tool and getting inline, internal styles as well as external, reading it is like O__o yea? and you want me to edit what exactly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio.Verani</title>
		<link>http://blog.designchair.co.uk/articles/a-sneak-peak-at-photoshop-cs5/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio.Verani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.designchair.co.uk/?p=60#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Well, i guess Adobe should mantain the lightness of the CS4 software, just for a start, because if the implement much more tools and services and the program become heavier than it is now, it would be a problem, specially for laptop users.
Well, for photoshop CS5, i would expect a SDK that allows producers from the 3D market to develop plug-ins of existing engines to work together with PS, like photorealistic renderers to allow designers to achieve greater levels of results.
I would ask Adobe to light down the HEAVY Illustrator in the next version, and look for more compatibility of the adobe suite with Windows 7, because i use both of them, and IL always crash when i close the program or try to save some complex work...it&#039;s really embarassing.
Thats what i think, hope it help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i guess Adobe should mantain the lightness of the CS4 software, just for a start, because if the implement much more tools and services and the program become heavier than it is now, it would be a problem, specially for laptop users.<br />
Well, for photoshop CS5, i would expect a SDK that allows producers from the 3D market to develop plug-ins of existing engines to work together with PS, like photorealistic renderers to allow designers to achieve greater levels of results.<br />
I would ask Adobe to light down the HEAVY Illustrator in the next version, and look for more compatibility of the adobe suite with Windows 7, because i use both of them, and IL always crash when i close the program or try to save some complex work&#8230;it&#8217;s really embarassing.<br />
Thats what i think, hope it help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

